The explanted sample was returned for evaluation.
Visual examination of the sample confirmed that there was physical damage to the polypropylene mesh side of the device.
The polypropylene fibers indicate the material has been recently cut and most likely occurred during resection of the device during the explant procedure.
There was an area of material deformation and holes in the center area of the eptfe layer.
The center areas of the eptfe layer where the holes are noted appear to have coincided with the report of small intestine possibly adhered to or in contact with this area of the device.
The holes that are present also appear to be new and most likely presented when bowel was removed from this area of the device.
Based on review it is highly likely that the damage that is identified at this time happened during the revision procedure when the mesh was explanted.
A review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification with no materials or manufacturing anomalies identified.
To date, this is the only reported complaint for this lot of (b)(4) units released for distribution on 04/24/2008.
Fistula formation and inflammation are known possible complications and are identified in the adverse reaction section of the instructions-for-use.
At this time no definitive conclusions can be made as to the cause of the patient¿s post-op complications.
The degree to which the device may have caused or contributed is undeterminable.
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.
Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|