• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT MINI TREK CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT MINI TREK CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1012270-15
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Intimal Dissection (1333); Occlusion (1984); Perforation (2001)
Event Date 03/10/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Patient (b)(6).The post procedure rca stenosis had 0% residual stenosis and a timi flow of iii.A 2.75 x 12 rx vision bms was then deployed in an unspecified non-rca vessel with a maximum pressure of 12 atm.A 014 balance middleweight 300 cm guide wire was then advanced to this distal target vessel.A 3.5 x 12 nc trek balloon was advanced but was also unable to cross.A 3.5 x 12 trek nc bdc crossed and was inflated to a maximum pressure of 12 atm.A 2.5 x 12 mini vision bms was deployed in an unspecified non-rca vessel at 10 atm.A 2.5 x 15 vision bms was advanced but failed to cross.A 4.0 x 12 trek nc balloon was advanced but also failed to cross.None of the failure to cross devices caused or contributed to any adverse patient effects or any clinically significant delay.An unspecified rx balloon catheter crossed and completed final dilatation in an unspecified non-rca vessel.While the spiral dissection was resolved and the patient remained stable, the patient was transferred to another facility to undergo cabg for repair / replacement of the ascending aorta.No additional information was provided.Concomitant medical products: guide wire: volcano pressure wire; 014 hi-torque (ht) floppy ii 190 cm (x2).Inflation: copilot inflation kit, guide cath: 6fr jr4 cordis, sheath: 6fr x 7 cm merit medical.The device was not returned.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during the procedure to treat a 100% stenosed right coronary artery (rca) with a timi flow of 0, a 6fr x 7 cm non-abbott access sheath was inserted via right radial artery access, followed by advancement of a 6fr jr4 non-abbott guiding catheter, a non-abbott pressure wire, and two 014 hi-torque (ht) floppy ii 190 cm wires to the distal rca.Pre-dilatation was performed using a 2.0 x 15 mm mini trek rx balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) inflated with a copilot inflation kit.A coronary spiral dissection of the ostial proximal right coronary artery (rca) with complete occlusion and perforation with contrast extravasation of the distal rca area into the aortic wall was observed.While an emergent coronary artery bypass graft (cabg) surgery was needed, there were no available facilities to treat the patient with cabg.Thus, a 3.5 x 16 mm rx graftmaster covered stent was deployed at 15 atmospheres (atm) for 20 seconds ostial proximal rca, resolving the spiral dissection and improving flow down the rca and posterior descending (pd) coronary artery.The uncovered distal rca staining was stable and the patient remained hemodynamically stable.For additional repair to the independent vessel area distal to the deployed graftmaster, the procedure was continued as follows: a 2.75 x 23 rx vision bare metal stent (bms) was then deployed at 10 atm.Another 2.75 x 23 rx vision bms was advanced but failed to cross.Dilatation was performed with a 3.0 x 15 trek rx balloon.A 2.5 x 18 rx mini vision bms was then deployed at 12 atm, followed by deployment of a 3.5 x 12 rx vision bms at 10 atm.A 2.75 x 18 rx vision and 2.75 x 12 rx vision bms were each advanced but failed to cross.*.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).There was no reported device malfunction and the product was not returned.A review of the lot history record and complaint history of the reported lot could not be conducted because the lot number was not provided.The reported patient effects of dissection, occlusion and perforation are listed in the mini trek rx ifu, as known patient effects.Based on the case information and related record review, a conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MINI TREK CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER
Type of Device
CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key6476395
MDR Text Key72250308
Report Number2024168-2017-02968
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K103110
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/10/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number1012270-15
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/19/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention; Disability;
Patient Age63 YR
Patient Weight80
-
-