• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 103
Device Problems Energy Output To Patient Tissue Incorrect (1209); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/22/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported by the physician's office that during the initial interrogation of the patient's vns, he received a message he had not seen before warning that he wanted to increase the output current more than recommended, which obscured the settings.When this message eventually disappeared, the recorded output current was a 0ma and the output current in the reprogram column showed he wanted to change the settings to 2.25ma, which he noted was the patient's output current at her previous interrogation.The physician explained he believed the next 2 settings were also 0ma, with the patient's previously programmed settings showing up in the column.The physician noted he reprogrammed the device and the settings reverted back to the appropriate column and the settings were then as they had been at the last appointment.It was further reported the patient was fine and experienced no issues.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Describe event or problem; corrected data: "the patient was referred for generator replacement due to normal battery depletion.The ifi = yes condition (intensified follow-up indicator) was observed by the physician approximately one month prior to the reported unintended settings." this information was inadvertently left off of the initial mfr.Report.
 
Event Description
The patient was referred for generator replacement due to normal battery depletion.The ifi = yes condition (intensified follow-up indicator) was observed by the physician approximately one month prior to the reported unintended settings.The company representative attended the patient's vns generator replacement surgery and noted the device was completely depleted on the surgery date.She also noted she was able to checked the physician's programming system and found that the system diagnostics showed the device was working as intended.Based on the information received, it is believed that the vns generator had simply further depleted to the pulsedisabled state on the date the physician reported the changed settings.During the pulsedisabled state, the device can still communicate, but has programmed itself to no longer deliver therapy as the battery has depleted.This explains the reason the physician observed that the settings were programmed to 0ma.Additionally, though the generator is disabled and no longer providing therapy (as intended) the battery will continue to deplete normally to the point of no communication.This condition was experienced by the company representative on the date of surgery.No device malfunction is suspected.The device is expected to be returned for analysis, but has not been received to date.
 
Event Description
The vns generator was received by the manufacturer for analysis.While product analysis is expected, it has not been completed to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Describe event or problem, corrected data: follow-up report #1 stated that the ifi = yes condition was observed one month prior to the believed unintended settings.However, the actual information received was that the system diagnostics were normal a month prior to the replacement surgery, and that the ifi = yes indicator was observed by the physician at the time of those system diagnostic test(s).(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Product analysis was completed on the returned generator.Visual examination showed only observations consistent with the explant process; no surface abnormalities were noted on this device.With the generator opened, no visual anomalies were found on the printed circuit board.During the bench interrogation, the generator was found to be pulse-disabled and at end of service (eos).The circuit board was subjected to electrical testing.All tests required for proper generator function passed.The battery measured 1.929 volts, confirming an eos condition.The cause of the end of service condition was normal current consumption.The internal device data showed that 114.323% of the battery had been consumed.Review of the internal device revealed no anomalies.Other than the expected end of service condition, there were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 103
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key6503210
MDR Text Key73120584
Report Number1644487-2017-03640
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/03/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/19/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/28/2014
Device Model Number103
Device Lot Number3271
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/22/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received06/19/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/23/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age15 YR
-
-