Batch review performed on 19 april 2017.Lot 143011: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 11 july 2014.Expiration date: 2019-05-31.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, (b)(4) items of the same lot have been already sold without any similar reported event.Additional information received on 20 april 2017 and includes: the revision is scheduled for (b)(6) 2017, the screw will be available at this date.Not yet explanted.
|
On (b)(4) 2017 the r&d project manager performed a visual inspection of the retrieved explanted components and commented as follows: tibia implant composed by: tibia baseplate - available for visual inspection.Double 5mm tibia augments - available for inspection still screwed to tibia baseplate.3mm offset connector - available for inspection still assembled to tibia baseplate.Cementless stem d11 l65 - available for inspection still assembled to offset connector.Hinge post extension - available for inspection.Hinge post screw - available for inspection.Uhmwpe insert - not available for inspection.Tibia insert fixation screw - available for inspection.The screw is found broken in 2 pieces.It is broken in the threaded shaft, in correspondence to the section at the level of the tibia baseplate.The remaining part of the screw is inside the tibia baseplate.Femoral implant composed by: hinge femoral component - available for inspection.Cementless stem - available for inspection still assembled to femoral component.The uhmwpe external bush for hinge post is found plastically deformed in the part that comes in contact with the hinge post.Due to this deformation the mechanical lock to limit hyperextension pass from 3 degrees to about 9 degrees.Conclusion: in a similar event occurred in the past, the screw was sent to an external laboratory for a failure analysis.The result of this analysis could most likely be applied also at this event.As a conclusion, the screw broke failed due to fatigue.The fracture morphology indicates that reversed bending took place, the bending however occurred primarily in one direction.A single and distinct fracture origin could not be found.Instead, a multitude of nonspecific fracture origins are observed along the thread root.The area of fracture origin does not show any distinctive features, apart from the fact that the material is slightly deformed at the bottom of the thread root.The thread root appears to have acted as a stress concentrating notch, since cracks are visible in several more positions.Judging from the results, the material itself does not seem to have been a contributing factor to the failure, as it shows ductile behaviour and the microstructure is fine-grained and homogeneous.Fatigue failure after 2 years from the implantation is an unlikely event.Since the material itself doesn't seem to have been a contributing factor to failure, we can only suppose that an excessive, unpredictable and unexpected stresses have been applied on the screw during tightening (caused by the misalignment of the screwdriver during fixation) or during activities of daily living.The most likely cause for this excessive load applied, could be related to the instability and the misalignment of the joint after the primary hinge surgery.Several elements lead us suppose that the joint was not stable and well positioned during primary surgery: a thicker tibia insert was used during revision surgery (during revision it was chosen to pass from a 20mm insert to a 23mm insert).An upsizing of the femur was required passing from a size 2 to a size 3 in revision adding 2 distal augments and 2 posterior augments to distalize the joint line and posteriorize the joint line in flexion.A correction tibia cut to better aligned the component was performed during revision surgery.Laxity of the collateral ligaments, as confirmed by the sales rep.Mal-positioning of the implant, instability and laxity could have lead to unexpected flexion - extension movement.In particular, the implants seems to have worked often in excessive hyperextension configuration with consequent excessive and unpredictable load transmission to the implant and in particular between the hinge post extension and the insert.Those loads could have caused the breakage of the fixation screw.These considerations lead us state that the event is not implant related.
|