CORDIS DE MEXICO POWERFLEXPRO 8MM6CM 135; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 4400806X |
Device Problem
Burst Container or Vessel (1074)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 03/03/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As reported, the powerflex pro 8mm 6cm 135 balloon was inserted into body-vessel-position.During inflation, physician noticed air on proximal end of balloon where the balloon was not inflating and getting to nominal pressure.It was later noted during evaluation of the device; the balloon device had a 3cm axial burst observed at the distal section of the balloon.The balloon catheter was easily removed.The physician used the balloon for pre-dilation of an external artery where it was mildly calcified.There were no difficulties removing the product from the hoop, the protective balloon cover, the stylet or any of the sterile packaging components.There were no kinks or other damages noted prior to inserting the product the product into the patient.The device prep normally.The contrast to saline ratio was 1:1.There was no difficulty crossing the lesion.The catheter has never been in an acute bend.The device was not used for a chronic total occlusion.The balloon catheter did not kink while being used.There was no resistance/friction with other devices.The following information was unknown: contrast media used; type and brand of inflation device used; indeflator used successfully with other devices; resistance/friction while inserting the balloon through the rotating hemostatic valve, the guide catheter, or the vessel; and the target lesion.One non-sterile unit of powerflexpro 8mm6cm 135 was received coiled inside a plastic bag.Per visual analysis, it was noticed that the balloon was previously inflated and deflated.No anomalies or damages were found on the received device.Leak test was performed to the received unit, the balloon device was inflated and 3cm axial burst was observed at the distal section of the balloon.Unit was sent to sem analysis and results showed that the external surface presented evidence of scratch marks near to the balloon burst and it¿s very likely that the same factors that caused the scratch marks on the balloon outer surface also contributed to the burst condition.The internal surface and distal marker band did not present any evidence of damages.No other anomalies were found during the analysis.A device history record (dhr) review of lot 17558986 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event. the reported ¿balloon - inflation difficulty¿ was confirmed during product analysis since a burst condition was found on the balloon.The cause of the balloon burst could not be conclusively determined during the analysis.Based on the limited information provided, vessel characteristics (mild calcification) may have contributed to the reported event as evidenced by the scratch marks noted during sem analysis.According to the instructions for use (ifu), ¿the rated burst pressure is based on the results of in vitro testing.At least 99.9% of the balloons (with a 95% confidence), will not burst at or below their rated burst pressure.Use of a pressure monitoring device is recommended to prevent over pressurization.¿ neither the dhr review nor the product analysis suggests that the event experienced by the customer could be related to the manufacturing process.Therefore, no corrective/preventive action will be taken.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received and during the evaluation of the device; the balloon device was inflated and 3cm axial burst was observed at the distal section of the balloon.As reported, the power flex pro 8mm 6cm 135 balloon was inserted into body-vessel-position.During inflation, physician noticed air on proximal end of balloon where the balloon was not inflating and getting to nominal pressure.Used balloon for pre-dilation of external artery where it was mildly calcified.There were no difficulties removing the product from the hoop, the protective balloon cover, the stylet or any of the sterile packaging components.There were no kinks or other damages noted prior to inserting the product the product into the patient.The device prep normally.The contrast to saline ratio was 1:1.There was no difficulty crossing the lesion.The catheter has never been in an acute bend.The device was not used for a chronic total occlusion.The balloon catheter did not kink while being used.There was no resistance/friction with other devices.The balloon catheter was easily removed.The following information was unknown: contrast media used; type and brand of inflation device used; indeflator used successfully with other devices; resistance/friction while inserting the balloon through the rotating hemostatic valve, the guide catheter, or the vessel; and the target lesion.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|