• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMERIEUX, INC VITEK® 2 ANC TEST KIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMERIEUX, INC VITEK® 2 ANC TEST KIT Back to Search Results
Model Number 21347
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A customer in (b)(6) reported to biomérieux discrepant results associated with vitek® 2 anc test kit (reference 21347).The customer reported the vitek® 2 anc card results as anaerococcus prevotii but an alternative testing method vms results reported oligella urethralis.The customer reported that eleven (11) tests were run on the vitek® 2, ten (10) resulted in no identification and one (1) result was too noisy to give a result.The vitek® instrument was fine-tuned and the customer reported the system was not working as expected.The identification results were normal and anaerococcus species not present in the vitek® 2.The customer reported using another method.The reference method used was sequencing, genus used the same method as the vitek® 2 but not the same species name.The analysis of new data from the customer (data from new tests) with next vitek® 2, (which contains 3 species of anaerococcus : anaerococcus prevotii, anaerococcus tetradius, anaerococcus vaginalis), the customer reported that the results again anaerococcus tetradius for two (2) of the eleven (11) tests with kb v3.1 industry and kb v3.2 (next kb) and 1 of the 11 tests with kb v3.0 clinic.Culture submittals were requested by biomérieux.An internal biomérieux investigation will be initiated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A customer in (b)(6) reported to biomérieux discrepant results associated with vitek® 2 anc test kit (reference (b)(4)).The customer submitted the strain for evaluation.An investigation was performed.The submitted strain was subcultured, and testing included anc cards from the customer's lot and a random lot, in duplicate, and 16s sequencing.All four anc cards tested resulted in excellent identifications of anaerococcus prevotii.16s sequencing gave the final identification of anaerococcus tetradius (99%).In conclusion, anaerococcus tetradius is not a species claimed by the vitek 2 anc card.The following limitation is stated in the vitek 2 product information concerning testing of unclaimed species: newly described or rare species may not be included in the anc database.Selected species will be added as strains become available.Testing of unclaimed species may result in an unidentified result or a misidentification.The vitek® 2 anc test kit performed as expected.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITEK® 2 ANC TEST KIT
Type of Device
VITEK® 2 ANC TEST KIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMERIEUX, INC
595 anglum road
saint louis MO 63042
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMERIEUX, INC
595 anglum road
saint louis MO 63042
Manufacturer Contact
ellen weltmer
595 anglum road
saint louis, MO 63042
MDR Report Key6529211
MDR Text Key74023152
Report Number1950204-2017-00132
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JSP
UDI-Device Identifier03573026144364
UDI-Public03573026144364
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K910666
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/28/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/03/2017
Device Model Number21347
Device Lot Number244397720
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/27/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-