• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZIMMER GMBH BIOLOX® DELTA, CERAMIC FEMORAL HEAD, S, 32/-3.5, TAPER 12/14; BIOLOX DELTA CERAMIC FEMORAL HEAD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZIMMER GMBH BIOLOX® DELTA, CERAMIC FEMORAL HEAD, S, 32/-3.5, TAPER 12/14; BIOLOX DELTA CERAMIC FEMORAL HEAD Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Partial Blockage (1065)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/05/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was received, the investigation is pending.The device history records were reviewed and found to be conforming.Intraoperative pictures, if available, were requested at complainant.A cause for this specific event cannot be ascertained from the information provided.As soon as supplemental information becomes available an updated report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It is reported that a patient underwent a primary surgery with a biolox® delta, ceramic femoral head, s, 32/- 3.5, taper 12/14 on (b)(6) 2017 on unknown hip side.During functional testing reduction, the head was found too short.Intra-operatively, head was not able to remove as it was well stuck together with stem.Thus head along with stem was exchanged intra-operatively.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device history records (dhr): the device manufacturing quality records indicate that the released components met all requirements to perform as intended.Trend analysis: during the trend analysis, no trend was identified.Review of event description: patient underwent primary surgery with brexis stem - biolox delta head on (b)(6), 2017.During functional testing reduction, the head was found too short.Intra-operatively, head was not able to remove as it was well stuck together with stem.Thus head along with stem was exchanged intra-operatively to a cls shaft.Brexis stem is a 3rd party product which is distributed by zb winterthur.Manufacturer is stemcup medical products ag.Review of received data: no medical data such as x-rays, surgical notes or any other case-relevant documents received devices analysis visual examination: for the investigation of the case the brexis stem and biolox delta ceramic head are received as one piece together.The two components are stuck and it was not possible to remove the head from the stem.The stem has some slight bone attachments on the surface indicating that the stem was placed into the bone.The ceramic head has metallic transfer on the bottom surface which most probably happened while it was tried to be extracted from the stem.Review of product documentation - product combination is approved by zimmer biomet.The length of the original ball head is determined during operation by means of manipulating trial ball head according to brexis surgical technique.Refer to page 9 of brexis surgical technique for the detailed explanation for the trial reduction using the trial head.Root cause analysis: root cause determination using dfmea - injury of or staff or surgeon due to wrong handling of device due to wrong information => possible: the ceramic head got stuck on the stem.Conclusion summary according to the reported event the ceramic ball head got stuck on the stem taper and it led to 20 min delay of the surgery while the surgeon was not able to remove the head, thus exchanging the brexis stem by cls stem.Brexis surgical technique explains the correct surgical procedure how the length of the ceramic original implant head is determined during operation by means of trial reduction with the trial head.This ensures that there are no longitudinal discrepancies when repositioining with the original ball head.After the exact size is found by trying out with the trial head it is not intended to remove an original ball head from the original shaft.In such a process the risk of injury to the shaft is too great.It is assumed that during the surgery trial head was not used, but instead directly the originical ceramic head is placed on the stem.Subsequently, when it is realized that the size of the original head does not match, it was not possible to remove the head from the stem therefore the stem-head had to be removed and cls stem had to be placed in.Based on the given information and the results of the investigation, we could identify a root cause for this issue.The root cause is the non-indicated use of the product.Surgeon did not follow the surgical technique.Zimmer (b)(4) considers this case as closed.Zimmer's reference number of this file is (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIOLOX® DELTA, CERAMIC FEMORAL HEAD, S, 32/-3.5, TAPER 12/14
Type of Device
BIOLOX DELTA CERAMIC FEMORAL HEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZIMMER GMBH
sulzer allee 8
sulzer industrie park
winterthur 8404
SZ  8404
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZIMMER GMBH
sulzer allee 8
sulzer industrie park
winterthur 8404
SZ   8404
Manufacturer Contact
kevin escapule
1800 west center street
warsaw, IN 46580
8006136131
MDR Report Key6562660
MDR Text Key75010958
Report Number0009613350-2017-00645
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LZO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/12/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/12/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number00-8775-032-01
Device Lot Number2875836
Other Device ID Number00889024430310
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/10/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/06/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured11/22/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age52 YR
-
-