Investigation evaluation: a product evaluation was not performed in response to this report because the product said to be involved was not provided to cook for evaluation.
The report could not be confirmed.
The wire guide subassembly device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.
A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.
The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.
A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.
Investigation conclusion: we could not conduct a complete investigation because the product said to be involved was not returned for evaluation.
A definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined.
The instructions for use instruct the user to do the following: "for best results, wire guide should be kept wet.
" failure to flush the wire guide can result in damage to the wire guide.
The instructions for use precaution the user that this product is not compatible with metal tip devices.
"if preloaded, use of wire guide with metal tip ercp devices may result in damage to external coating and/or tip of wire guide.
" the reported observation can occur if the wire guide was used with an incompatible accessory device.
If additional pressure is applied to the wire guide and/or accessory device(s) while moving the wire guide inside the accessory device(s), this could contribute to wire guide coating damage.
Prior to distribution, all fusion omni-tome pre-loaded sphincterotomes are subject to a visual inspection to ensure device integrity.
A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.
Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.
The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.
Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.
Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
Other text : investigation evaluation: a product evaluation was not performed in response to this report because the product said to be involved was not provided to cook for evaluation.
The report could not be confirmed.
The wire guide subassembly device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.
A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.
The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.
A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.
Investigation conclusion: we could not conduct a complete investigation because the product said to be involved was not returned for evaluation.
A definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined.
The instructions for use instruct the user to do the following: "for best results, wire guide should be kept wet.
" failure to flush the wire guide can result in damage to the wire guide.
The instructions for use precaution the user that this product is not compatible with metal tip devices.
"if preloaded, use of wire guide with metal tip ercp devices may result in damage to external coating and/or tip of wire guide.
" the reported observation can occur if the wire guide was used with an incompatible accessory device.
If additional pressure is applied to the wire guide and/or accessory device(s) while moving the wire guide inside the accessory device(s), this could contribute to wire guide coating damage.
Prior to distribution, all fusion omni-tome pre-loaded sphincterotomes are subject to a visual inspection to ensure device integrity.
A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.
Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.
The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.
Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.
Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|