Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-FEM-CELECT-PERM |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Defective Device (2588)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Distress (2329)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Catalog is unknown but referred to as cook celect filter.(b)(4).Since catalog# is unknown 510(k) could be either k061815, k073374 or k090140.(b)(4).Investigation is still in progress.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description of event according to initial reporter: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2009." patient outcome: alleged "survival, punitive damages, manufacturing defect, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress".Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Exemption number e2016032.(b)(4).Manufacturer ref# (b)(4).It has not been possible to investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer reference # (b)(4).Exemption number e2016032.(b)(4).Name and address for importer site: (b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information received on 09/25/2017 as follows: patient received an implant on (b)(6) 2009 via the right common femoral vein due to polytrauma with relative contraindication to anticoagulation.Patient is alleging that the device is unable to be retrieved.No documentation of attempted retrieval has been provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer reference # (b)(4).Exemption number e2016032.(b)(4).It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating 'celect, unable to retrieve'.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer reference # (b)(4).Exemption number e2016032.(b)(4).Name and address for importer site: (b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information received on 09/25/2017 as follows: patient received an implant on (b)(6) 2009 via the right common femoral vein due to polytrauma with relative contraindication to anticoagulation.Patient alleges significant back pain due to the device and that a pain management specialist is required to manage the pain.Patient is alleging that the device is unable to be retrieved.No documentation of attempted retrieval has been provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer reference # (b)(4).Exemption number e2016032.(b)(4).It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating 'significant back pain, pain management specialist required to manage pain, unable to retrieve'.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.Unknown if the reported back pain is directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|