(b)(4).
Evaluation summary: visual, dimensional and functional inspections were performed on the returned device.
The reported separation was confirmed; however, the reported difficulty positioning the device with the rotating hemostatic valve was not.
A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.
Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.
The investigation determined the reported shaft separation appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure; however, a conclusive cause for the reported difficulty positioning the device could not be determined.
There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|