Reported event an event regarding alleged failure to extend involving a jts total femur was reported.The event was confirmed.Method and results device evaluation and results: visual inspection the external surface of the returned device has visible surface marks and discoloration on the femoral component and the shafts.There is no visible gap at the join between the shaft sections.When the piston was initially removed from the shaft the tip of the output shaft square drive was observed to have broken off and was loose within the shaft.Dimensional inspection: not performed as reported issue is functional not dimensional.Functional inspection: the device was inserted into the magnet test jig and it was audibly confirmed that the motor was operating.However, the jts total femur was not observed to be extending during a 5-minute test.The returned device is non-functional.Material analysis not performed as reported issue is functional, not material.Medical records received and evaluation: x ray review - this is the jts total femoral replacement which was inserted in 2017.The image provided shows that no extension has been made.The reason behind the claimed issue regarding lengthening of the implant is unknown, therefore further investigation is required should the implant be returned.Therefore, the reason for revision has been radiographically confirmed.Device history review: review of the device history records indicate one device was manufactured and accepted into final stock on 11 jan, 2017 with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: based on the device identification the complaint data bases were reviewed from 01 may 2016 to present for similar reported events regarding seizing.There have been no other events reported.Conclusions: a lengthening procedure was attended by an siw design engineer in june 2017 who reported that the gearbox sounded good but no extension was shown on the x-ray and the prosthesis did not grow.The device was subsequently explanted and returned to siw in december 2018.The investigation of the returned device concluded that it is most likely that the device extension mechanism was initially operated by the user in the incorrect direction, this resulted in the mechanism becoming jammed closed instead of extending as intended, the absence of a gap at the join between the shaft sections indicates that the device may have been operated in reverse.Continuing to attempt to use the device in the incorrect direction may have resulted in the implant extension motor straining against an immovable jam and the torque produced could eventually damage the output shaft square drive rendering the extension mechanism non functional.Instruction on the direction the drive unit should be used is included in the lengthening protocol and operation manual and the operation drawing provided with the implant.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.Siw will continue to monitor for trends.No action is required at this time as there is no indication to suggest a product non-conformity or unanticipated hazard.
|