Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-1-FEM-TULIP |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Difficult to Remove (1528); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Perforation (2001); Blood Loss (2597); No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 06/12/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Catalog is unknown but referred to as cook günther tulip filter name and address for importer site: (b)(4).Since catalog# is unknown 510(k) could be either k090140, k112119 or k121057.(b)(4).Investigation is still in progress.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description of event according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook günther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2015".Patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information received on 06/02/2017 as follows: plaintiff allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2015 via the right common femoral vein due to pulmonary embolus and deep vein thrombosis.Plaintiff is alleging device fracture and is unable to be retrieved, bleeding and pain.Plaintiff alleges attempted retrievals on (b)(6) 2015 and (b)(6) 2016.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer reference # (b)(4).Exemption number e2016032.(b)(4).It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating 'tulip, fracture, unable to retrieve, bleeding, pain'.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter fracture is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Fracture of a filter leg can be due to repetitive motion on a filter leg in an unusual stressed position.Among other causes, filter fracture may be associated with a filter leg perforating the ivc, a filter leg being caught in a side branch (e.G.Renal vein), excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G.A surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and / or procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.It has been reported that retrieval of a fractured filter or filter fragments using endovascular techniques is possible.Fracture of the wire is a known risk in relation to an implanted filter and reported in the published scientific literature.It is known from the published scientific literature that a filter fragment embolized into the heart or lung may be safely retrieved.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.Unknown if the reported bleeding, pain is directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this time.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Event Description
|
As per an angiogram performed on (b)(6) 2015 it states, "no significant change in thrombus within the ivc located superior to a previously placed ivc filter.Thrombus attached to the hook of a previously placed ivc filter.".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Exemption number e2016032.William cook europe aps (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of cook medical incorporated (cmi) (importer).Name and address for importer site: cook medical incorporated (cmi) (b)(4).Registration no.: (b)(4).Investigation: the following allegations have been investigated: thrombus.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|