• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 106
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Abdominal Pain (1685); Chest Pain (1776); Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980)
Event Date 04/26/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was having pain due to upgrading from a 103 to a 106 due to the increase in size of generator.Clinic notes indicated that the patient had had some pain at the generator site since the procedure.She also had felt a continuous electric shock in her chest wall since her replacement that radiated to her left arm and left upper abdomen as well as numbness down her left arm.After she turned her generator off, her symptoms improved.She continued to have daily auras and seizures and had the worst period of seizures that she's had in years.For these reasons the surgeon recommended replacement of her generator with a m103 due to previous good results.The surgeon's office indicated that they believed that the continuous shocking may be caused by autostimulation.The issues resolved when the device was turned off, but the patient's seizure rate increased because of this.The surgery was indicated to be due to medical necessity.The patient was replaced due to painful stimulation.Lead impedance issues were not detected prior to the replacement.Per the surgeon, he did not observe any lead defects on the visible portion of lead during surgery.No further relevant information has been received to date.The suspect product has not been received to date.
 
Event Description
The explanted generator was received and underwent product analysis.The generator was monitored for 24 hours in a simulated body temperature environment and was able to provide the intended therapy for the entirety of the monitoring period.The septum was not cored, thus eliminating the possibility of a potential unintended electrical current path through body fluids.Per a comprehensive electrical evaluation, the generator performed according to functional specifications with no anomalies found.The generator's internal data was reviewed.It was found that while the patient's generator was on, the patient received 21 autostimulations per day.Different autostimulation sensitivities and thresholds were not tried outside of the appointment.No further relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 106
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key6668568
MDR Text Key78440666
Report Number1644487-2017-04044
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/01/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/26/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/21/2019
Device Model Number106
Device Lot Number204027
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/06/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received07/06/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/21/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age37 YR
-
-