Catalog Number 1012451-08 |
Device Problems
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Material Rupture (1546); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 06/08/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
Visual inspection was performed on the returned device.
The reported separation was confirmed.
The reported balloon rupture could not be confirmed due to the condition of the returned device.
It was reported that the balloon ruptured at 22 atmopsheres, which is above the rated burst pressure.
It should be noted that the nc trek rx coronary dilatation catheters instructions for use states: balloon pressure should not exceed the rated burst pressure.
A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.
Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents from this lot.
The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported balloon rupture; however, the reported balloon separation appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure.
There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.
(b)(4).
The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.
It has not yet been received.
A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in the left anterior descending artery.
A 3.
5 x 8 mm nc trek balloon dilatation catheter was being used for post-dilatation; however, the balloon ruptured during first inflation at 22 atmospheres.
The balloon ruptured in a way that it separated and half of the balloon is lost in the patient.
The guiding catheter was flushed; however, the missing balloon piece was not there.
The case was concluded and the patient was monitored overnight; however, has since been discharged home.
There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure and no adverse patient effects.
No additional information was provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|