Model Number U128 |
Device Problems
High impedance (1291); Ambient Noise Problem (2877)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 04/22/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device and lead remain in service.As no further information concerning this report is expected, our investigation is complete.This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
Boston scientific received information that this pacemaker and associated right ventricular (rv) lead triggered the lead safety switch (lss) for high, out-of-range pacing impedance measurements.The patient was brought in to evaluate the lead.In the office, in unipolar the impedance was 346 ohms.In bipolar the impedance was 495 ohms with acceptable r-wave measurements.Isometrics and other movements were performed while testing the impedance and all measurements were within normal range.No noise was created with the isometrics.The lead was programmed back to bipolar and was monitored via enrollment in the remote monitoring system.Two weeks later, an alert for an impedance greater than 2,000 ohms was observed.A review of lead measurements in the remote monitoring system found the impedances ranged between 500-1300 ohms, with occasional impedance values that were greater than 2,000 ohms.The clinician planned to leave the lead programmed to unipolar.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device and lead remain in service with no intervention reported.As no further information concerning this report is expected, our investigation is complete.This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
Boston scientific received additional information.Another lead safety switch (lss) had occurred the following month, indicating the lead was not left programmed to unipolar as previously reported.This was observed at the patient's routine device check in (b)(6) 2018.It was noted the lead measurements were within normal range in both unipolar and bipolar configurations; there was an episode showing noise that was due to the unipolar sensing, but the noise did not inhibit pacing.Technical services again discussed trying to reproduce noise with isometrics and pocket manipulation and doing commanded rv lead impedances if noise was produced.An x-ray was also recommended.The patient did not recall using a tens unit or any item that would cause external noise and impact the impedance measurements.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|