• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CAREFUSION, INC DTOUCH2 FENEST DISSECTOR 16MMJAW 5MM; LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CAREFUSION, INC DTOUCH2 FENEST DISSECTOR 16MMJAW 5MM; LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY Back to Search Results
Model Number SP90-7836
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Laceration(s) (1946)
Event Date 06/01/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).If further information becomes available a follow up medwatch will be submitted.
 
Event Description
The customer reported the grasper tore the bowel when grabbing onto the bowel when he was repairing during bariatric surgery.The tear was repaired by sutures and the procedure stayed laparoscopic.No other reported medical interventions.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4): one (1) sp90-7836 dtouch2 fenest dissector was returned for evaluation.Evaluation by the lead manufacturing technician and quality engineer did not confirm the reported failure.Visual and functional inspection was performed and resulted in actuating rod in the handle was bent causing the device to not rotate as well.The device was still able to function and hold suture.The overall sharpness was then examined, in which the sample was declared to have no raised edges and was of the usual beveled edge.According to the records the device has been in the possession of the customer for 5 years without a repair or a complaint from the customer.This edge has also not been an issue over the 5 years this sample has been in existence.Testing was performed on muslin cloth with a pulling force.No tearing or cutting was observed on the cloth.There are many unknowns concerning the reported failure: the amount of procedures the sample has endured, the amount of usage, the amount of uses in which the sample did not cause excess trauma and the amount of wear upon the instrument.In addition, it is unknown of the user technique and the force that was applied to the tissue during the surgery which was performed.This would indicate the amount of trauma in which the cut bowel endured.As this device was found to be within specification, as a recommendation the use of a bowel clamp might be better suitable for usage since it has longer jaws with 2x3 rows of smooth teeth and is available under product numbers sp90-7845 and sp90-7846.A review of the device history record (s) did not reveal non-conformances.The devices passed all acceptance criteria for release.Conclusion(s): other- not confirmed the reported failure could not be duplicated.Bd will continue to trend and monitor this reported issue and for this product family.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DTOUCH2 FENEST DISSECTOR 16MMJAW 5MM
Type of Device
LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
CAREFUSION, INC
75 north fairway drive
vernon hills IL 60061
Manufacturer (Section G)
CAREFUSION, INC
5175 south royal atlanta dr
tucker GA 30084
Manufacturer Contact
anna wehrheim
75 north fairway drive
vernon hills, IL 60061
MDR Report Key6706149
MDR Text Key79788888
Report Number1038548-2017-00129
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GCJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K930667
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/22/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/12/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSP90-7836
Device Lot Number843985 C12
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/20/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/09/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-