• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA CAPIOX FX OXYGENATOR; OXYGENATOR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA CAPIOX FX OXYGENATOR; OXYGENATOR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CX*FX25RW
Device Problem Increase in Pressure (1491)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/13/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The actual device has not yet been returned to the manufacturing facility for evaluation.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.For this reason (b)(4) was used in the conclusions section of evaluation codes.The production lot number was not provided by the user facility which prevented a meaningful review of production and complaint records.(b)(4).All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
 
Event Description
The user facility reported pressure increase in the capiox device during a procedure.Follow up communication with the user facility confirmed the following information: the pressure increased in the capiox device to 470 mmhg; afterwards the pressure was 120 mmhg; the flow was 4.6 l/min.; the oxygenator was replaced with other terumo product without any complications; there was no significant delay in the procedure; there was no blood lost; treatment was executed as planned; the patient was treated as intended; the patient recovered from the reported serious injury; and the user reported this event to (b)(6) as follows: for an aorta valve inspection the patient was connected to the heart lung machine (12:14 h start time).During the perfusion (12:50) the pressure before oxygenator started to increase without noticeable reason, the system was exchanged at 12:59.Before perfusion began the act was 526s.At oxygenator exchange the act was 606s.The exchange led to circulatory arrest of 57 seconds, with a body temperature of 32°c.The exchange happened by routine and trouble-free.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted as follow up number 1 to provide the actual device evaluation results as well as the lot number, expiration date and manufacturing date.Visual inspection found no obvious anomalies in the appearance of the device.The actual device was rinsed, dried and subjected to another visual inspection.It was confirmed not to have any anomalies.The actual device was built into a circuit.Bovine blood @hct35% and temp.37°c was circulated in the circuit, while the pressure drop was determined at each flow rate.The obtained values were confirmed to meet manufacturing specifications.Bovine blood was kept circulated in the actual device for 6 hours.No obstruction occurred.When the circulation was ceased, the actual device was flushed with water.No clot was found inside the actual device.The perfusion record was reviewed.At 12:14 the circulation was initiated.At 12:50 the inlet pressure increased.At 12:59, the actual oxygenator was changed out.At the initiation of the circulation no increase in the pressure was noted.From this, it is assumable clots formed during the circulation and the oxygenator was obstructed, resulting in the reported high pressure.A review of the device history record and product release decision control sheet of the involved product code/lot number combination revealed no relevant findings.A search of the complaint file found one other report of this nature from the same user facility with the involved product code/lot number combination.See mdr 9681834-2017-00173.There is no evidence this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.The investigation result verified the actual device was the normal product.The exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based on the available information.The device labeling does address the potential for such an event in the instructions-for-use (ifu) with statements such as the following: do not reduce heparin during circulation.Otherwise, blood clotting might occur.Adequate heparinization of the blood is required to prevent it from clotting in the system.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAPIOX FX OXYGENATOR
Type of Device
OXYGENATOR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, shizuoka 418
JA  418
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
reg. no. 9681834
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, shizuoka 418
JA   418
Manufacturer Contact
terry callahan
reg. no. 2243441
2101 cottontail ln.
somerset, NJ 08873
8002837866
MDR Report Key6773960
MDR Text Key82053184
Report Number9681834-2017-00170
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTZ
UDI-Device Identifier04987350701046
UDI-Public04987350701046
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K071494
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/08/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2017
Device Catalogue NumberCX*FX25RW
Device Lot Number141031
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/25/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/25/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/31/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient Weight75
-
-