• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. CONQUEST 40 PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. CONQUEST 40 PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL Back to Search Results
Model Number CQF7584
Device Problems Difficult to Insert (1316); Retraction Problem (1536); Material Rupture (1546)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/31/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
No hospital/medical records or medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure of a venous anastomosis, an alleged pinhole rupture occurred on the first inflation attempt and was subsequently difficult to retract through the 7fr sheath.The pta balloon was exchanged over the guidewire for another that was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: the device history records were reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only complaint reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.Conclusion: the device was returned for evaluation.A preliminary visual inspection found no rupture or retraction related defects with the device.However after an inflation attempt was made, a pinhole rupture was identified on the barrel of the balloon.Upon inserting the device through an in-house sheath, resistance was met at the proximal cone of the device.The balloon was stripped of the fibers and cut open to expose the inner balloon lumen.However, no signs of resistance could be identified.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for a pinhole rupture, as well as insertion issues through a sheath.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported sheath-related retraction issues, as the device was not able to be fully inserted through the sheath.The definitive root cause for the identified insertion issues, pinhole rupture, or reported retraction issue could not be determined based upon the available information.It is unknown if patient and/or procedural issues contributed to the reported event.Labeling review: the current ifu (instructions for use) states: warnings: do not exceed the rbp recommended for this device.Balloon rupture may occur if the rbp rating is exceeded.To prevent over pressurization, use of a pressure monitoring device is recommended.When the catheter is exposed to the vascular system, it should be manipulated while under high-quality fluoroscopic observation.Do not advance or retract the catheter unless the balloon is fully deflated.If resistance is met during manipulation, determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.Applying excessive force to the catheter can result in tip breakage or balloon separation.Precautions: if resistance is felt during post procedure withdrawal of the catheter through the introducer sheath, determine if contrast is trapped in the balloon with fluoroscopy.If contrast is present, push the balloon out of the sheath and then completely evacuate the contrast before proceeding to withdraw the balloon.If resistance is still felt during post procedure withdrawal of the catheter, it is recommended to remove the balloon catheter and guidewire/introducer sheath as a single unit.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure of a venous anastomosis, an alleged pinhole rupture occurred on the first inflation attempt and was subsequently difficult to retract through the 7fr sheath.The pta balloon was exchanged over the guidewire for another that was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONQUEST 40 PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V.
blvd montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key6828217
MDR Text Key83954116
Report Number2020394-2017-01038
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LIT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741060557
UDI-Public(01)00801741060557
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K120660
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/20/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/29/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2020
Device Model NumberCQF7584
Device Catalogue NumberCQF7584
Device Lot NumberREBR1263
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/10/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/13/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/21/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age52 YR
Patient Weight91
-
-