• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARTHROCARE CORP. MAGNUM 2 KNOTLESS IMPLANT; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARTHROCARE CORP. MAGNUM 2 KNOTLESS IMPLANT; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number OM-1502
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/07/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that when attempting to deploy the anchor, the black handle closed and a loud crack was heard but both anchors wings had not deployed.The surgeon removed sutures and re-stitched with perfect passer and same problem occurred with a 2nd anchor.The procedure was successfully completed using a helix anchor to maintain suture tension and a 3rd magnum 2 anchor which deployed as expected.Complaint 2 of 2.See (b)(4) for original report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The returned device, intended for use in treatment, was returned for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the device and the reported incident.Visual inspection of the returned magnum2 knotless implant om-1502 shows a deployed device.The sutures are visible outside the metal rod and contaminated with bloody substances.Both sutures were completely reeled through the wheel.The wings are in a partially opened state at distal end.There are no manufacturing abnormalities visually observed with the returned instrument.The complaint was verified and the root cause could not be determined with certainty.Factors unrelated to the manufacture or design of the device that could have contributed to the reported event includes: (1) improper suture loading, (2) excessive tensioning or (3) improper alignment of the inserter handle with the bone hole.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported magnum 2 was not returned for evaluation.A relationship between the product and reported incident cannot be established as the product was not returned.Per customer communication the device was being returned for evaluation; however we have not received the device.Customer complaint cannot be verified due to the product was not returned.Root cause is unable to be determined; however the most probable cause may be due to: improper alignment of the implant and inserter handle with the bone hole while inserting the implant.Bending or twisting of the inserter handle during and after insertion will damage the implant or incomplete insertion may result.There were no indications that would suggest that the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAGNUM 2 KNOTLESS IMPLANT
Type of Device
FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARTHROCARE CORP.
7000 w. william cannon
austin TX 78735
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARTHROCARE CORP.
7000 w. william cannon
austin TX 78735
Manufacturer Contact
jim gonzales
7000 w. william cannon
austin, TX 78735
MDR Report Key6833420
MDR Text Key85626501
Report Number3006524618-2017-00243
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
K042914
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/31/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberOM-1502
Device Lot Number1154341
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/23/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/06/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age44 YR
-
-