The involved nail was implanted in a patient (b)(6).Approximately 10 weeks post-operation, the patient had seizure and fell.Due to the second trauma (fall), the nail broke.Examination of the production records of the involved device did not reveal a deviation that may have contributed to the reported case.It is noted, that during the revision surgery a larger nail was implanted.Although requested, the involved nail was not available to the manufacturer for its examination.
|
The involved product (11 mm diameter tibial nail) was implanted on (b)(6) 2016 in a patient (b)(6).According to the information provided to the company, patient fell while having a seizure, and nail broke.Nail was removed on (b)(6) 2017, and replaced with a larger nail of another company (of 12 mm diameter).
|