Product evaluation: the hs bur was received for analysis.Visually, there was some discoloration of the outer tube just proximal to the radius that is consistent with excess heat as indicated by the customer.The inner assembly was stretched out of the outer tube support area by approximately 0.19¿ which indicates spiral wrap damage.The inner assembly was turned using the inner hub and the tip did not move indicating spiral wrap breakage.The proximal end of the inner assembly was removed and the location of the spiral wrap break corresponded to the discoloration observed on the outer tube.The hub bushings were gouged and worn.There were striations on the inner shaft 0.64¿ from the distal face of the inner hub.The inside diameter of the outer tube at the distal was worn with corresponding damage to the inner assembly.The information is consistent with heat induced resistance / breakage brought on by excess friction between the inner and outer assemblies.Note: the customer indicated that they used an m5 handpiece; this handpiece has a top speed of 30,000 rpm, however, this product has a maximum recommended speed of 12,000 rpm.The ifu contains warnings that excessive pressure applied to bur may cause damage, bending or prying may break the blade or bur, and, do not use burs above the speed indicated on the bur label.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
During a maxillectomy, an m5 microdebrider was being used to run a 70-degree 4mm high speed diamond bur when the bur "overheated in the curved section and caused a thermal injury to the patient¿s left nostril.It was noted that after this occurred, the user looked at the bur and found that "the flexible shaft inside [the bur] is severed, [it was assumed] it stopped spinning.A dark spot on the curved section was noted when it was removed.The thermal injury was "treated with topical antibiotic ointment"; the available information indicates that the thermal injury is considered resolved; nothing further reported by the patient.There was no report of a serious injury.
|