The associated complaint devices were not returned for evaluation.A clinical investigation concluded that this complaint from (b)(6) reported a revision of a hip, 3 years post primary surgery, secondary to dislocations.It has been communicated that ¿the surgeon does not fault the implants¿.Based on the surgeons statement, the cause of the dislocations, that precipitated the revision, is the ¿too little anteversion and too much inclination¿ and not a product failure.No information on the patient¿s current status has been submitted to be included in a clinical investigation.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal any material or manufacturing deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history on the reportedly failed parts did not reveal any prior complaints for the listed batches.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.If the devices or new information are received in the future, this complaint can be re-opened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.
|