|
Catalog Number 466F220A |
Device Problems
Occlusion Within Device (1423); Difficult to Remove (1528)
|
Patient Problem
Coagulation Disorder (1779)
|
Event Date 06/11/2013 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Please note that the exact event date is unknown and that the event date is the complaint awareness date.The product is not available for evaluation and testing.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported through the legal department via a legal brief, the patient underwent placement of a trapease inferior vena cava (ivc) filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages to the patient, including, but not limited to, blood clots, clotting and occlusion of the ivc filter.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment as there was an unsuccessful attempt to remove the filter.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, and pain and suffering, and other damages.No additional information is available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As reported, the patient underwent placement of a trapease inferior vena cava (ivc) filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages to the patient, including, but not limited to, blood clots, clotting and occlusion of the ivc filter.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment as there was an unsuccessful attempt to remove the filter.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, and pain and suffering, and other damages.No additional information is available.The product was not returned for analysis.Additionally, as the sterile lot number was not available, device history record review could not be performed.The trapease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Blood clots and occlusion of the ivc filter does not represent a device malfunction.Clinical factors that may have influenced the event include patient, pharmacological and lesion characteristics.Based on the minimal information provided, it is not possible to draw a clinical conclusion or determine a root cause for the reported event.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported event is related to the design, manufacturing process or implantation of the device; therefore no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The following additional information received per the patient profile form (ppf) indicates that the patient underwent an unsuccessful attempt to remove the filter nine months and a day post implantation.The patient also reports that the filter is embedded and to be suffering from fear.According to the information received in the medical records, the patient has a history of pulmonary emboli (pe).During the filter placement procedure via the right groin, the filter was deployed below the renal veins but above the bifurcation of the ivc.The patient tolerated the procedure well.Additional information is pending and will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As reported, the patient underwent placement of an optease inferior vena cava (ivc) filter.Per the medical records, the patient had a history of pulmonary emboli (pe).It was also noted in medical records that the filter was placed below the renal veins but above the bifurcation of the ivc and that the patient tolerated the procedure well.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages to the patient, including, but not limited to, blood clots, clotting and occlusion of the ivc filter.Per the patient profile from (ppf), patient alleges filter embedded in wall of the ivc.The patient became aware of the alleged events three years and eight months post implantation.The patient underwent an unsuccessful percutaneous attempt to remove the filter nine months post implantation.The patient experienced fear of further complications due to instability.The filter is unavailable for analysis.The product was not returned for analysis.A review of the device history record (dhr) associated with lot 15385970 revealed no anomalies during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The optease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Without procedural films for review, the reported embedded in ivc wall and retrieval difficulty could not be confirmed and the exact cause could not be determined.Retrieval of the optease vena cava filter is indicated, in the us, up to 14 days post implantation.Usage of the product other than that indicated in the product's ifu may involve additional risks not described in the labeling.The predominant concern is the development of endothelialization, which would make subsequent removal difficult.Endothelialization has been shown to lead to explantation problems after as short a period as 12 days.Blood clots and occlusive thrombosis within the filter and vasculature do not represent a device malfunction.Anxiety does not represent a device malfunction and may be related to underlying patient related issues.Clinical factors that may have influenced the event include patient, pharmacological and lesion characteristics.Without procedural films or images for review the reported event(s) could not be confirmed.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|