Despite several attempts to obtain the reported device, this device has not been returned to conmed for evaluation.
Photographs were requested and, to date, none have been received.
This incident cannot be verified and a root cause cannot be determined.
The serial number provided was invalid, therefore, manufacturing documents were unable to be reviewed.
A two-year review of complaint history revealed 7 similar reports for this product family.
In that same timeframe, (b)(4) devices have been manufactured and shipped worldwide.
It is standard medical practice to inspect and test all equipment before use.
This incident type will continue to be monitored through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
|
The user facility reported that while the surgeon was using the oscillating handpiece the scrub nurse assembled, he noticed the blade was coming loose.
When he pulled it out of the patients' mouth, during a multi-part oral reconstruction procedure, it was noted that multiple pieces of the device were detached.
He retrieved parts of the device from the patients' mouth but when he tried to account for all pieces, two could not be located.
A x-ray revealed one piece which the surgeon retrieved, however, the second piece was not accounted for.
The surgeon performed a bronchoscopy to ensure the missing piece was not in the lungs.
No patient injury was reported and the procedure was completed with more than a thirty minute delay.
This report is raised on the basis of a device malfunction with an unlocated device component, which led to surgical intervention causing a lengthy procedural delay.
This incident is being reported as an adverse event.
|