• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT ARMADA 35 PTA CATHETER; PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT ARMADA 35 PTA CATHETER; PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number B1070-080
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Rupture (1546); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 09/28/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a heavily calcified lesion in distal superficial femoral artery.Resistance was met with the calcification during advancement of the 7.0x80mm armada 35 balloon catheter to the target lesion.The balloon was inflated 3 times at 15 atmospheres, and during the 3rd inflation the balloon ruptured.Resistance was felt during removal of the armada and the ruptured balloon could not be pulled into the introducer sheath.The sheath was coming out of the groin and the patients' groin started to bleed/leak.The patient was sent to surgery with the sheath, shaft, and balloon all still in.The shaft was cut during surgery and the separated portion was successfully removed.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: visual inspections were performed on the returned device.The reported resistance met during advancement and removal could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.The reported balloon rupture was confirmed.The instructions for use states: inflation in excess of the rated burst pressure (rbp) may cause the balloon to rupture.It is likely that inflating the balloon above the rbp contributed to the balloon rupture.The reported patient effects of hemorrhage, as listed in the armada 35, instructions for use is a known adverse event.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulties, patient effects and treatment appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARMADA 35 PTA CATHETER
Type of Device
PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
EL COYOL, COSTA RICA REG# 3009031392
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key6968807
MDR Text Key89958600
Report Number2024168-2017-08384
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LIT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFI
PMA/PMN Number
K111899
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/23/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2020
Device Catalogue NumberB1070-080
Device Lot Number70316G1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/23/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/06/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/01/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
INTRODUCER SHEATH: 6FR
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-