Investigation: samples or photos have not received for analysis of the incident in question.Dhr/ qn/ ncmr review: assembled lot: 7179974, used in the claimed final product lot: 7195922 of insyte autoguard 22g x 1.00 was analyzed for "needle retraction" and ¿part activation¿ tests, and it was not evidenced failure in the activation of the part during the performing of these tests.However, "catheter over bevel" records have been evidenced that may cause the defect lie distance out of the specification which indirectly may lead to "needle activation failure".Qn/ ncmr review: it was evidenced quality notification (qn) # (b)(4) for the lie distance defect, which involves the assembly lot: 7179974.Although this nonconformity treats the lie distance defect, according to the investigations of this quality notification, the defect may lead to a needle retraction failure as reported in this complaint.After analysis of the qn/ ncmr of the claimed product, it was possible to confirm the complaint of the needle retraction failure.Based on a severity assessment and occurrence it was determined that no capa is required at this time.The complaint was added to the complaint database for trend analysis, which is regularly monitored.Although it has been evidenced the record of the quality notification above mentioned, during the investigations of this complaint it has been verified that the defect of this non-conformity could indirectly lead to the incident in question.However, it was not possible to determinate precisely its root cause to date.For more details check quality notification #: (b)(4).
|