Catalog Number 03.010.368 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 10/02/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient identifier, date of birth, and weight not available for reporting.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.A review of the device history records has been requested.Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that during a procedure to repair a femoral diaphyseal fracture on (b)(6) 2017, while using the reamer, the tip of the reamer broke off.Surgeon removed the nail and removed the fragments generated.Surgeon stated the reamer passed through the nail without difficulty but the tip broke around the femoral neck.It was noted that the reamer did not touch the nail.Surgery was completed successfully with a delay of approximately 60 minutes and no harm to patient.Patient status reported as okay.Concomitant devices reported: nail (part number unknown, lot number unknown, quantity 1).This report is for one (1) reamer.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A manufacturing investigation was conducted/performed.The report indicates that the: 1x article 03.010.368 with lot u145207 / reamer ø4.5/6.5 l450 f/hip scr f/expert received and forwarded to us supplier for investigation: as received condition of device: the device was received with the drill step fracturing at the transition to the main drill body.Investigation summary: supplier: (b)(4).Per the attached supplier product investigation: one part of product code 03.010.368 from lot u145207 and the review was completed on 12/21/17 this lot was manufactured in december of 2011.The dhr was reviewed and it was found that the job was process according the production plan with conforming inspection results.Due to the nature of failure, the drill step fracturing at the transition to the main drill body, the web, transition angle, step diameter, and drill body diameter were all measured.Supplier investigation¿.All features were found to be conforming.The exact root cause could not be found.It is likely that an overloading situation led to this reamer breakage.No manufacturing related issue was identified and/or confirmed, therefore review to the specific prm and prm line is not applicable.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A device history record (dhr) review was performed for part # 03.010.368, lot # u145207: manufacturing location: (b)(4), supplier: external supplier (b)(4), manufacturing date: 13.Dec.2011: no non-conformance reports (ncrs) were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|