• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES MONUMENT; ROD,FIXATION,INTRAMEDULLARY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES MONUMENT; ROD,FIXATION,INTRAMEDULLARY Back to Search Results
Device Problem Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient weight not available for reporting.This report is for an unknown tfna nail-long.Device remains implanted and was not explanted complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a tnfa (trochanteric fixation nail-advanced) nail failed postoperatively.It was further explained that the nail, unknown helical blade and distal locking screw (quantity unknown) were originally implanted on (b)(6) 2017 and post-operative x-rays taken on an unknown date during a postoperative visit revealed that the locking mechanism in the nail has failed to lock causing the helical blade to migrate or slide out of its intended position.Reportedly, nail was locked per procedure using a torque limiting guide and x-rays taken right after the surgery showed the construct locked in the proper location and that the locking mechanism in the nail appeared to be down.The patient is reported to be in pain but "ok" and there are currently no plans to revise the construct at this time.Should the patient be revised at a later date, the construct will be returned for investigation.Concomitant devices reported: distal locking screws.This report is for one (1) unknown tfna nail long.This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A physical device was not returned but x-rays were reviewed.The complaint of migration was able to be confirmed via the x-rays but the complaint of the locking mechanism failing could not be confirmed.Pre/intra-operative x-rays shows the lateral side of the helical blade within the lateral cortex of the bone but postoperative x-rays show the blade extending past the lateral cortex.A drawing review could not be performed as the physical product was not returned for evaluation.Replication of the complaint is not applicable as the malfunction occurred in situ and the part was not returned for investigation.A definitive root cause could not be determined as the circumstances around the malfunction are unknown or cannot be confirmed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
ROD,FIXATION,INTRAMEDULLARY
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES MONUMENT
1051 synthes ave
monument CO 80132
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES MONUMENT
1051 synthes ave
monument CO 80132
Manufacturer Contact
michael cote
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key6981950
MDR Text Key90388747
Report Number1719045-2017-11118
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/05/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/26/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/01/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age57 YR
-
-