• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: IANTECH, INC. LOW ENERGY ENDOCAPSULAR PHACO (LEEP) DEVICE; OPHTHALMIC HOOK

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

IANTECH, INC. LOW ENERGY ENDOCAPSULAR PHACO (LEEP) DEVICE; OPHTHALMIC HOOK Back to Search Results
Model Number FG-11881
Device Problems Use of Device Problem (1670); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Capsular Bag Tear (2639); Vitrectomy (2643)
Event Date 09/11/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was discarded by the user and is not available for evaluation.The event was solely attributed to use error and there was no device malfunction.Capsular bag damage is an inherent risk of cataract surgery.The device history records were reviewed for this lot number and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings that relate to the reported event.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
A patient with a moderately advanced senile cataract underwent cataract surgery in the left eye on (b)(6) 2017 where the leep device was used to section the cataractous lens into fragments.During surgery, a femtosecond laser was used for the capsulotomy and nucleus fragmentation, after which the leep device was introduced into the eye and nucleus engagement was initiated.During this portion of the procedure the iris constricted causing extremely limited visibility and there was a substantial amount of proximal-distal motion during retraction of the cutting loop and removal.At some point during the phacoemulsification procedure and phaco tip chopping it was observed that the posterior capsule had ruptured.The event required secondary surgical intervention to perform an anterior vitrectomy and remove the lens fragments from the anterior chamber.A three-piece intraocular lens was implanted without incident.There was no adverse impact on the patient's vision and no sequelae.The surgeon was unable to attribute the capsular damage to one specific device and stated that use of any of the concurrent devices (femtosecond laser, phacoemulsification equipment, or the leep) may have caused or contributed to the event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LOW ENERGY ENDOCAPSULAR PHACO (LEEP) DEVICE
Type of Device
OPHTHALMIC HOOK
Manufacturer (Section D)
IANTECH, INC.
8748 technology way
reno NV 89521
Manufacturer (Section G)
IANTECH, INC.
8748 technology way
reno NV 89521
Manufacturer Contact
jane demkovich
8748 technology way
reno, NV 89521
7754731014
MDR Report Key7062209
MDR Text Key93030233
Report Number3012123033-2017-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HNQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/27/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/27/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date08/31/2018
Device Model NumberFG-11881
Device Lot NumberFG20170828-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/11/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/28/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-