The patient's attorney alleged a deficiency against the device resulting in an unspecified adverse outcome.Product was used for therapeutic treatment.The device was used in a transvaginal periurethral sling with cystoscopy procedure where the patient suffered complications: in 2006, pain and recurrence of symptoms, type ii stress urinary incontinence, underwent cystoscopy/marshall test with transvaginal periurethral sling.In 2008, urgency, frequency of urination with urge related incontinence, underwent urodynamics, cystoscopy/marshall test in 2008 and diagnosed with minimal loss of bladder support, mixed urinary incontinence with increasing stress component.The patient suffered a diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence.The patient had a pervious history: cystocele and hypermobility of bladder, incontinence, menorrhagia.
|