Catalog Number 1008201-20 |
Device Problems
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult to Remove (1528)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 11/08/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The customer reported the device was discarded.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up will be submitted with all relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a de novo lesion in the non-tortuous, heavily calcified, 80% stenosed, mid right subclavian artery.A 7.0 x 20 mm viatrac plus balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) was selected for the procedure.Following inflation of the balloon, significant resistance was felt while trying to retract the bdc over the unspecified guide wire.This resulted in the balloon separating from the shaft of the bdc and being stuck on the guide wire.The guide wire and balloon were successfully removed together from the anatomy without incident.An unspecified guide wire was reinserted into the anatomy across the lesion and the procedure was completed with the successful deployment of an unspecified stent implant.There was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.There was no reported adverse patient sequela.No additional information provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device was initially reported as returning for analysis, but has now been reported as not returning because it was discarded at the account.The device was not returned for analysis.It is likely that during use the clearance between the guide wire lumen and the guide wire became reduced causing resistance.Further attempts to move the balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) from the guide wire likely caused the devices to become frozen together resulting in the separation.A review of the lot history records revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.The investigation determined the reported difficulties were likely due to case circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|