• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 106
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Chest Pain (1776); Neck Pain (2433); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 11/13/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Report received that a patient had pain at the generator incision site.The physician later indicated that he believed the generator was positioned too laterally.However, there was no indication that it had migrated from its original position.Further information was received that the patient presented with episodes of pain which reportedly spread to the left neck.He also had coughing.Both of these events reportedly occurred with stimulation.The physician indicated that he believed this was indicative of a malfunction of the generator.The patient was referred for surgery, although it was not stated whether it was a planned pocket revision or full vns revision.The vns was turned off.The physician's notes indicated that a "lead test" was performed and results were ok.However, impedance value was not noted.No further relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Further information was received that the patient experienced both painful stimulation that occurred "several times a day" and pain in the chest.The physician reportedly did not know whether the generator had migrated.The physician did not know the cause of the pain and painful stimulation and if the two events were related to the possible migration.The impedance value from the clinic visit where the patient first reported the adverse events was provided.It was within normal limits.Further information was received that the patient was seen by the surgeon.The surgeon determined that a revision was not necessary because the main source of the patient's pain was from the stimulation.This was able to be controlled by decreasing the vns pulse width.The surgeon did confirm that the device may have migrated outside of the pocket, but remained in a good place and was not a contributing factor to the painful stimulation.Information from the implanting surgeon indicated that non-absorbable sutures were not used to secure the generator in the pocket at the last replacement.No further relevant information has been received to date.No further relevant intervention has been taken to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 106
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key7102536
MDR Text Key94342711
Report Number1644487-2017-04958
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
UDI-Device Identifier05425025750061
UDI-Public05425025750061
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/31/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/08/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date10/21/2018
Device Model Number106
Device Lot Number204027
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received01/08/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/21/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age58 YR
-
-