• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY S2 CONTROLLER ONLY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY S2 CONTROLLER ONLY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number S2
Device Problem Inaccurate Flow Rate (1249)
Patient Problem Not Applicable (3189)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported devices are being returned to conmed for evaluation.A supplemental and final report will be filed following the completion of the devices evaluation and complaint investigation.
 
Event Description
Upon incoming inspection the distributor reported that the s2 pumpette controllers, 30 units, were not suitable for use.The distributor found the rate not to be accurate, as the flow rate was below the printed scales.This was found before any patient contact; therefore, no patient injury was reported.This report is raised on the basis of a reported malfunction with potential for patient injury with recurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The devices were returned to conmed for evaluation and contained ten s2 controllers assembled to the customer's iv tube set and twenty s2 controllers were received raw.Six of the assembled devices and seven of the raw s2 controllers were randomly sampled and tested.The selected devices were tested for flow rates at the 20 ml/hr and 100 ml/hr controller dial settings.The results showed excessive variation in flow rate.A review of the manufacturing documents verified the device was produced per current and approved procedures and material specifications.Non-conformances regarding the product's identity, quality, safety, effectiveness or performance were not identified during manufacture.There have been no other similar complaints for this lot product and failure mode.A two-year review of complaint history revealed 17 similar complaints, with 307 devices, for this product family and failure mode.In that same time frame, (b)(4) units were sold and shipped worldwide, making the rate of occurrence for this failure 0.122 percent.A risk analysis was performed and found this failure mode and occurrence level to be consistent and acceptable with current risk documents.The instructions for used advise and warns the user of the following.The dial numbers are approximate and confirm drip rate by using timer or watch with a second hand.An investigation has been initiated to determine the root cause for this incident.This issue will continue to be monitored through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
S2 CONTROLLER ONLY
Type of Device
S2
Manufacturer (Section D)
CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY
ave. alejandro dumas no. 11321
complejo industrial chihuahua
chihuahua CP 11 36
MX  CP 1136
Manufacturer (Section G)
CONMED CORPORATION
525 french road
utica NY 13502 5994
Manufacturer Contact
martha camacho urribarri
525 french road
utica, NY 13502
3156243051
MDR Report Key7122047
MDR Text Key95739532
Report Number3007305485-2017-00281
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FPA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeLE
PMA/PMN Number
K905498/A
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/19/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/15/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Catalogue NumberS2
Device Lot Number201709244
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/20/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/04/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/24/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-