• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC UNKNOWN; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC UNKNOWN; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problems Unintended Movement (3026); Insufficient Information (3190); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204); Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Anxiety (2328); No Information (3190)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion.
 
Event Description
It is alleged that the plaintiff received a gunther filter on (b)(6) 2005.It is alleged that the plaintiff was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event Description
This additional information received on 9feb2018 as follows: ¿[pt] allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2005 via the right internal jugular vein due to pulmonary embolism with prior knee replacement.[pt] is alleging tilt, organ perforation-mesenteric.[pt] further alleges anxiety/stress.There are no filter retrieval attempts.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation - it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating "gunther tulip filter implanted." cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating ¿tulip - tilt, embedded (unable to retrieve), vc & organ perforation, anxiety/stress".Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter tilt is a known risk in relation to filter implant reported in the published scientific literature and may occur during placement or during implanting period.A filter that is embedded in the wall of the ivc may be difficult to retrieve.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.Vena cava wall perforation is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Among other causes, vena cava wall perforation may inadvertently be initiated by improper deployment, excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and (or) procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.There is a current debate in the published scientific literature on a differentiation between ivc wall perforation with and without clinical sequelae.E.G.Filter legs may be outside the contrast lumen on imaging without actually perforating the ivc wall (known as tenting) and with no clinical sequelae.In contrast, perforation of adjacent organs is reported with clinical sequelae.Unknown if the reported stress/anxiety is directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.Rpn and lot# are unknown, but filter tulip is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
MDR Report Key7125115
MDR Text Key95171724
Report Number1820334-2017-04436
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/10/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/18/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/04/2018
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Other;
Patient Weight92
-
-