• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL TIBIAL NAIL S2 Ø9X375 MM; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL TIBIAL NAIL S2 Ø9X375 MM; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 17220937S
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 08/23/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device will not be returned.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided on a supplemental report.Device disposition is unknown.
 
Event Description
The pharmacist at the hospital, reported the following event to the sales rep: "on (b)(6) 2017, a s2 nail was implanted by dr (b)(6).On (b)(6) 2017 - revision of the patient performed by dr (b)(6).By explanting the nail : it was fractured in 2.Event will be reported to (b)(6).".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation revealed the broken nail to be the primary product.No deviations were found during review of the manufacturing and inspection documents (dhr).Available information revealed that the nail allegedly broke after a period of approx.6 weeks of implantation.In this case it was reported that a relative young male patient had been active, post-operatively.The surgeon¿s post-op recommendations were to authorize partial support with english canes.It was not possible to examine the implant regarding evidences of exceeding weight bearing which would be additional material deformation in the bearing points; usually caused by the patient¿s activity.As no deviation was found in the manufacturing documents a deficiency of the documented nail was not verified.Review of complaint history, capa databases and risk analysis did not identify any conspicuity.The review of the risk assessment for the failure mode indicated the issue was addressed adequately.There were no actions in place related to the reported event for the subject product.No non-conformity was identified.Potential adverse events and potential root causes are / were stated in the labelling.The event was not linked to a deficiency of the devices but was rather linked to patient factors.If additional information is received the investigation will be reopened.
 
Event Description
The pharmacist at the hospital, reported the following event to the sales rep: "on (b)(6) 2017, a s2 nail was implanted by dr (b)(6).On (b)(6) 2017 - revision of the patient performed by dr (b)(6) by explanting the nail : it was fractured in 2.Event will be reported to (b)(6).".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TIBIAL NAIL S2 Ø9X375 MM
Type of Device
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
Manufacturer Contact
rose haas
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key7131261
MDR Text Key95319486
Report Number0009610622-2017-00380
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K021027
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Pharmacist
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/16/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/19/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date05/31/2021
Device Catalogue Number17220937S
Device Lot NumberK02C8F2
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/19/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/16/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age58 YR
Patient Weight110
-
-