• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY2C0410
Device Problems Split (2537); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/27/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly.The distal tip of the ruby coil¿s embolization coil had offset coil winds.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the ruby coil was embolization coil had offset coil winds.This damage may have occurred due to forceful manipulation of the ruby coil through a damaged microcatheter or against another source of resistance.The offset coil winds likely contributed to the resistance experienced during advancement.The non-penumbra microcatheter mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.The ruby coil was attempted to be advanced through a demonstration microcatheter; however, the ruby coil could not be re-sheathed due to the offset coil winds.Therefore, the ruby coil could not be functionally tested though a demonstration microcatheter.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the gastroduodenal artery (gda) using ruby coils.During the procedure, the physician experienced resistance while advancing a ruby coil through a non-penumbra microcatheter, and reported that under fluoroscopy it appeared that the ruby coil distal end was split.Therefore, the microcatheter was removed with the ruby coil inside.The procedure was then completed using the same microcatheter and additional ruby coils.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key7131738
MDR Text Key95344765
Report Number3005168196-2017-02286
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548012841
UDI-Public00814548012841
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/28/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/19/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Catalogue NumberRBY2C0410
Device Lot NumberF78624
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/05/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/28/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/10/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age53 YR
Patient Weight64
-
-