Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-FEM |
Device Problems
Unintended Movement (3026); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Anxiety (2328); Depression (2361); No Information (3190)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is alleged that the plaintiff received a gunther filter on (b)(6) 2007.It is alleged that the plaintiff was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation - it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating, "tilt, vena cava perforation, organ perforation - mesentery, anxiety." cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Vena cava wall perforation is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Among other causes, vena cava wall perforation may inadvertently be initiated by improper deployment, excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and (or) procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.There is a current debate in the published scientific literature on a differentiation between ivc wall perforation with and without clinical sequelae, e.G., filter legs may be outside the contrast lumen on imaging without actually perforating the ivc wall (known as tenting) and with no clinical sequelae.In contrast, perforation of adjacent organs is reported with clinical sequelae.Filter tilt is a known risk in relation to filter implant reported in the published scientific literature and may occur during placement or during implanting period.Unknown if the reported anxiety is directly related to the filter and unable to identify corresponding failure mode(s) at this time.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G., intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating ¿gunther tulip filter implanted".Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information received on 31jan2018 as follows: pt.Allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2007 due to polytrauma/multi fractures s/p motor-cross accident.Pt.Is alleging tilt, vena cava perforation, organ perforation-mesentery and anxiety.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information received on 21may2018 as follows: it is noted pt.Experienced depression with no additional details.There have been no attempts of device retrieval.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable, or unchanged.Patient code: depression (2361) - not listed in the ifu.It is unknown if the reported claims of psychological issue(s) are directly related to the filter.We are unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received.The additional information received does not change the conclusion of the previously completed investigation this report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|