• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THORATEC CORPORATION HEARTMATE II LVAS; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THORATEC CORPORATION HEARTMATE II LVAS; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 106015
Device Problem Partial Blockage (1065)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/24/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device unique identifier(udi)-device was manufactured prior to the udi labeling implementation.Approximate age of device-3 year and 10 months.The patient remains on lvad support with no further issues reported.No further information was provided.A supplemental report will be submitted when the manufacturer''s investigation is completed.
 
Event Description
The patient was implanted with a left ventricular assist device (lvad) on (b)(6) 2014.On (b)(6) 2017, it was reported that the patient¿s lvad system had been indicating low flow/red heart alarms for approximately 12 hours.The patient remained asymptomatic.Oral and intravenous fluids were being administered to the patient.An echocardiogram ramp study performed was reportedly within normal limits.The system controller log file submitted to the manufacturer¿s technical services for analysis confirmed the reported low flow alarms.On (b)(6) 2017, it was reported that the low flow alarms continued to be persisted without signs of decompensation or fluid overload.An echocardiogram revealed that the aortic valve remained open with increments in the pump speed.The pump speed was adjusted to 9800 rpms with less occurrence of low flow alarms.The patient¿s inr was 3.3 and on intravenous heparin.There were no signs of hemolysis.A ct scan of the chest demonstrated narrowing of the outflow graft at the anastomosis site.Intervention with stenting of the outflow graft was performed via endovascular approach.After the outflow graft stenting procedure was performed, subsequent system controller log files showed that the pump parameters returned to patient¿s baseline values.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Although the evaluation of the submitted system controller log files confirmed the report of low flow alarms, a specific cause for the events could not be conclusively determined through this evaluation.A review of the device history records revealed no deviations from manufacturing or quality assurance specifications.No further information was provided.The manufacturer is closing the file on this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HEARTMATE II LVAS
Type of Device
LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
THORATEC CORPORATION
6035 stoneridge drive
pleasanton CA 94588
Manufacturer (Section G)
THORATEC CORPORATION
6035 stoneridge drive
pleasanton CA 94588
Manufacturer Contact
bob fryc
6101 stoneridge dr.
pleasanton, CA 94588
7818528390
MDR Report Key7134739
MDR Text Key95377896
Report Number2916596-2017-03284
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/21/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/20/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2016
Device Catalogue Number106015
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/29/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/11/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
Patient Weight76
-
-