• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SAPIEN XT VALVE UNKNOWN; PULMONARY VALVE PROSTHESIS PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SAPIEN XT VALVE UNKNOWN; PULMONARY VALVE PROSTHESIS PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number SAPIEN XT UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Arrhythmia (1721)
Event Date 11/22/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Per the instructions for use (ifu), conduction system defects (heart block) which may require a permanent pacemaker are potential adverse events associated with balloon aortic valvuloplasty, deployment of the prosthetic valve, and the overall tavr procedure.According to the valve academic research consortium (varc) guidelines, the close anatomical relationship between the aortic valve complex and the branching atrioventricular bundle may provide an explanation for these complications of the tavr procedure.According to literature review, and as documented in a technical summary written by edwards lifesciences, atrioventricular conduction disturbances after tavr are associated with many patient related and procedural related factors, including pre-operative co-morbid status, the degree and bulkiness of aortic valve and annular calcification, inter-ventricular septal thickness, pre-existing electrocardiogram abnormalities, the depth of prosthesis implantation, and the profile of the implanted prosthesis.Unlike conventional avr, where there may be localized trauma due to decalcification of the annulus and/or suture placement in the proximity of the av node or the bundles, tavr may cause conduction abnormalities through mechanical impingement of the conduction system by the prosthesis.The mechanisms of the development of heart block after tavr are well documented and described in the literature.It is also documented that pre-existing heart block is common in patients undergoing tavr or surgical avr and another 4-6 % will develop postoperative heart block, potentially requiring a permanent pacemaker.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a device malfunction contributed to this adverse event.The cause for the arrhythmias could not be determined with the limited available information, however is likely related to the mechanisms described above.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.
 
Event Description
As reported by our affiliates in (b)(4), per the article ¿early outcomes of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation using the edwards sapien xt transcatheter heart valve system¿, a multinational, multicentre, retrospective, observational registry analysis of patients who underwent percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (ppvi) using the edwards sapien xt valve was performed.46 patients were enrolled and the majority had tetralogy of fallot as the underlying diagnosis and stentless xenograft as the most common rvot anatomy.Of the 46 patients, four patients had arrhythmias requiring pacing, drugs or cardioversion.Reference: nikolaus a.Haas, et al., early outcomes of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation using the edwards sapien xt transcatheter heart valve system.International journal of cardiology (2017).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The event date was inadvertently entered incorrectly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This is three of four manufacturer reports being submitted for this article.Please reference related manufacturer report numbers: 2015691-2017-04487, 2015691-2017-04488, 2015691-2017-04490, 2015691-2017-04491.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SAPIEN XT VALVE UNKNOWN
Type of Device
PULMONARY VALVE PROSTHESIS PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
frances preston
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492505190
MDR Report Key7141368
MDR Text Key95589630
Report Number2015691-2017-04490
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPV
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P130009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/21/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSAPIEN XT UNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/13/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-