Model Number AU00T0 |
Device Problem
Use of Device Problem (1670)
|
Patient Problem
Capsular Bag Tear (2639)
|
Event Date 11/16/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product evaluation: viscoelastic was not provided; it is unknown if a qualified product was used.
The product investigation could not identify a root cause.
Material properties of non-qualified ovds (ophthalmic viscosurgical devices) may contribute to underfill, overfill, misfolding of the haptics, or other inconsistent folding outcomes.
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received, indicating that after injection of the implant, the surgeon noticed that the implant was folded in the eye.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received, indicating that after injection of the implant, the surgeon noticed that the implant was "crumpled" in the eye.
In a returned questionnaire, the implanting physician confirmed that sudden release of the iol from the preloaded cartridge led the central posterior capsule tear.
It was also reported that anterior vitrectomy was performed as vitreous presented.
Implantation of a posterior chamber lens into the sulcus was also performed after removal of the first lens through an enlarged incision.
The incision was then sutured with two stitches.
The surgeon confirmed that although the patient had strong myopia, there was no capsular damage noted after the phaco step and before implantation of the lens.
There has been no sign of retinal detachment.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product evaluation: the product was not returned for analysis.
Complaint history and product history records were reviewed and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.
There have been no other complaints reported in the lot number.
A root cause has not been identified.
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A facility representative reported that during a cataract removal with intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure, a folding issue led to a capsular bag rupture, as the iol left the injector too quickly (quick release).
The iol was cut to be removed from the patient's eye, and a multipiece iol was placed in the sulcus instead.
It was noted that the injector and iol involved are not available for return.
Additional information has been requested.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|