• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC GUNTHER TULIP FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC GUNTHER TULIP FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Blood Loss (2597); No Information (3190)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion.
 
Event Description
It is alleged that the plaintiff received a gunther filter on (b)(6) 2008.It is alleged that the plaintiff was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
 
Event Description
This additional information received on 31/jan/2018 as follows: patient received an implant on (b)(6) 2008 via the right common femoral vein due to upcoming bariatric surgery.Patient is alleging organ perforation, bleeding, anxiety, mental anguish and stress due to the device.Patient alleges that the device is unable to be retrieved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation - it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating ¿gunther tulip filter implanted".Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating, ¿vc and organ (aorta) perforation, bleeding, anxiety, mental anguish, stress, unable to be removed." cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Vena cava wall perforation is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Among other causes, vena cava wall perforation may inadvertently be initiated by improper deployment, excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and (or) procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.There is a current debate in the published scientific literature on a differentiation between ivc wall perforation with and without clinical sequelae, e.G., filter legs may be outside the contrast lumen on imaging without actually perforating the ivc wall (known as tenting) and with no clinical sequelae.In contrast, perforation of adjacent organs is reported with clinical sequelae.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.Unknown if the reported anxiety, mental anguish and stress are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications, and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GUNTHER TULIP FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
MDR Report Key7142309
MDR Text Key95627560
Report Number1820334-2017-04324
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K043509
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/04/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/22/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-FEM
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/26/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Other;
Patient Weight91
-
-