Medtronic received information that a pipeline flex with shield device did not open at the distal segment during a flow diversion procedure.The reported device was used to treat a patient's right internal carotid artery fusiform aneurysm measured 4.6mm in max diameter with neck width of 7.1 diameter.The distal and proximal landing zone diameters were 4.3mm and 4.6mm respectively.Vessel tortuosity was reported as moderate.It was reported the device was prepared following the instruction for use and the microcatheter was flushed continuously with heparinized saline during the procedure.The pipeline flex device encountered friction at the distal segment of the microcatheter.When attempted to deploy the pipeline flex with shield braid at a bend, the braid would not open.The physician attempted to resheath the device, but the microcatheter would not advance.The pipeline flex with shield device was stuck at the distal segment of the microcatheter.The physician then attempted to deployed more of the pipeline flex with shield braid, which started to flatten.With some force, the physician was able to resheathed the entire pipeline flex with shield device into the microcatheter.This set of pipeline flex devices and microcatheter were removed from the patient.New flow diverter and microcatheter were used to complete the flow diversion treatment for the patient with perfect post procedural angiographic results.No injury reported.
|
Additional information, device evaluation the device was received for evaluation.The reported pipeline flex with shield technology (ped2) device was received stuck within a microcatheter.When the ped2 was pushed out of the microcatheter for further examination, the ped2 braid was found fully opened.The report of ped2 did not open at the distal segment was not confirmed.Moderate fraying was noticed at both the distal and proximal end of the this ped2 braid.The delivery wire of the ped2 was also noted to have stretched distal hypotube and bent at 29.5cm from the proximal end.No other anomalies were observed.Based on the device analysis, the observed damages on the ped2 most likely happened when high force or excessive friction encountered during delivery and retrieval of the ped2.The patient's moderately tortuous anatomy could have contributed to friction and need for high force.The ped2 instruction for use states" caution: if high forces or excessive friction is encountered during delivery, discontinue delivery of the device and identify the cause of the resistance, remove device and micro catheter simultaneously.Advancement of the pipeline¿ flex embolization device against resistance may result in damage or patient injury." all devices are 100% inspected for damage and irregularities during manufacture.No evidence was found to suggest that the devices failed to meet specifications; therefore, manufacturing has been ruled out as a potential cause.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|