Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 11/15/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
The complaint device has been returned, but the device investigation has not yet been completed.
Once the evaluation is completed, a supplemental medwatch 3500a will be submitted.
If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.
Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that while disassembling the jammed articular surface construct the technician fractured the base of articular surface.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Cmp-(b)(4).
Updated: reported event is considered confirmed as the returned tasp was fractured.
Visual examination concludes that the returned device is fractured, tasp eexhibits signs of repeated use(nicked and gouged ) also has fractured on the medial side of the post.
All pieces were returned.
Fracture analysis of the tasp provisional revealed fracture surface artifacts consistent with bending overload fracture.
Device history record was reviewed and no discrepancies were found.
Per the instrument/provisional use and care package insert, instruments should be carefully inspected before each use and should not be used if the instruments are marred or worn.
The package insert also states that breakage can occur if the instruments are subjected to high loads or impactions.
The root cause is considered to be operational context as the device was difficult to disassemble due to being jammed with tissue from use.
If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.
Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|
|
Event Description
|
No further event information available at the time of this report.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|