• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. VENTRALEX ST; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. VENTRALEX ST; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5950007
Device Problems Defective Device (2588); Insufficient Information (3190); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Abscess (1690); Adhesion(s) (1695); Fistula (1862); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Disability (2371)
Event Date 06/11/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information provided we are unable to determine to what extent, if any the bard device may have caused or contributed to the events as alleged by the patient¿s attorney.The information provided alleges that the, "patient underwent an additional surgery to repair the hernia defect and remove it." medical records were not provided and the description does not clearly define what "remove it" is referring to (example possible mesh explant, partial explant, or removal/repair of the hernia defect itself without explant of previously placed mesh).As such at this time, we have not identified this as reported device explant.Additionally, it is unclear at this time if the hernia defect repaired post implant of the mesh, was a recurrence of the original hernia defect or a new hernia defect, however, recurrence is a known inherent risk of hernia repair surgery and is identified in the adverse reaction section of the instructions-for-use as a possible complication.A review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.This emdr represents the bard device implanted on (b)(6) 2014 (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard device implanted on (b)(6) 2009 (device #1).The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.Not returned.
 
Event Description
The following was alleged by the patient's attorney: on (b)(6) 2009: the patient underwent surgery for repair of an incisional hernia.A bard/davol ventralex st hernia patch, reference number 5950007 and lot number huti1030 (device #1), was implanted to repair the hernia defect.On (b)(6) 2014: the patient underwent a second repair of an incisional hernia.A bard/davol ventralex st hernia patch, reference number 5950007 and lot number huyf1416 (device #2), was implanted to repair the hernia defect.On (b)(6) 2015: the patient underwent an additional surgery to repair the hernia defect and "remove it." as alleged, the patient was injured severely and permanently and has suffered and will continue to suffer physical pain due to the alleged defective ventralex st hernia patch.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information provided we are unable to determine to what extent, if any the bard device may have caused or contributed to the events as alleged by the patient¿s attorney.The information provided alleges that the, "patient underwent an additional surgery to repair the hernia defect and remove it." medical records were not provided and the description does not clearly define what "remove it" is referring to (example possible mesh explant, partial explant, or removal/repair of the hernia defect itself without explant of previously placed mesh).As such at this time, we have not identified this as reported device explant.Additionally, it is unclear at this time if the hernia defect repaired post implant of the mesh, was a recurrence of the original hernia defect or a new hernia defect, however, recurrence is a known inherent risk of hernia repair surgery and is identified in the adverse reaction section of the instructions-for-use as a possible complication.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Based on the additional information received, there is no change to the initial determination, no conclusions can be made.Per medical records review, about 9 months post implant of ventralex st mesh, patient was diagnosed with abscess, adhesions, hernia recurrence and fistula thereby underwent repair with explant of mesh.The instructions-for-use supplied with the device lists fistula and adhesions as possible complications.Review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.This supplemental emdr represents ventralex st mesh (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent another ventralex st mesh (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
 
Event Description
The following was alleged by the patient's attorney: (b)(6) 2009: the patient underwent surgery for repair of an incisional hernia.A bard/davol ventralex st hernia patch, reference number (b)(4) and lot number huti1030 (device #1), was implanted to repair the hernia defect.(b)(6)2014: the patient underwent a second repair of an incisional hernia.A bard/davol ventralex st hernia patch, reference number (b)(4) and lot number huyf1416 (device #2), was implanted to repair the hernia defect.(b)(6)2015: the patient underwent an additional surgery to repair the hernia defect and "remove it." as alleged, the patient was injured severely and permanently and has suffered and will continue to suffer physical pain due to the alleged defective ventralex st hernia patch.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6)2009 - patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralex st mesh (device #1).Per operative notes, "three small hernias were identified, two of which were joined in the midline.A small, more lateral hernial defect was closed internally.A ventralex st hernia patch (device #1) was placed in the defect and sutured." (b)(6)2014 - patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralex st mesh (device #2).Per operative notes, "the hernia sac was encountered and dissected down to the fascia and removed.A ventralex st patch (device #2) was placed on the defect and closed transversely." (note: there was no mention/visualization of device #1 during this procedure).(b)(6)2015 - patient was diagnosed with incarcerated incisional hernia and enterocutaneous fistula with abscess thereby underwent small bowel resection and explant of mesh (device #1 & #2).Per operative notes, "the hernia was opened and noted to have an enterocutaneous fistula in the abdominal cavity.The small bowel segment had fistulized to the patch (device #1 & #2).All the adhesions were freed up and closed." (note: it was unclear which mesh was explanted during this procedure).Attorney alleges that the patient had abscess, adhesions, bowel obstruction, bowel removal, fistulae, pain and emotional injuries.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VENTRALEX ST
Type of Device
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC.
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key7150660
MDR Text Key95916826
Report Number1213643-2017-01116
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FTL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K101928
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/05/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/28/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/28/2016
Device Catalogue Number5950007
Device Lot NumberHUYF1416
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/14/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/28/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Disability; Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight51 KG
-
-