Currently, it is unknown to what extent the device may have caused or contributed to the reported event.
Based on the information provided, it is alleged "the patient underwent an additional surgery to repair the hernia defect.
" it is unclear at this time if the hernia defect repaired post implant of the mesh was a recurrence of the original hernia defect or a new hernia defect, however, recurrence is a known inherent risk of hernia repair surgery and is identified in the adverse reaction section of the instructions-for-use as a possible complication.
A manufacturing review was performed which found no anomalies during the manufacturing process of the device.
If additional event and/or evaluation information is obtained, a follow up mdr will be submitted.
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.
Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
The following was reported to davol by the patient's attorney: on (b)(6) 2007 - the patient underwent surgery for repair of a ventral hernia, a bard davol "marlex" reference number (b)(4), lot number 43cqd058 was implanted to repair the hernia defect.
On (b)(6) 2010 - the patient underwent an additional surgery for recurrence repair.
The attorney alleges the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer pain and was injured severely and permanently.
|