• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A. HAKIM INLINE PROGRAMMABLE VALVE SG; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A. HAKIM INLINE PROGRAMMABLE VALVE SG; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 82-3162
Device Problems Occlusion Within Device (1423); Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem Hydrocephalus (3272)
Event Date 12/12/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Upon completion of the investigation a follow up report will be filed.
 
Event Description
The valve was implanted to the patient via vp-shunt on (b)(6) 2017 with setting 100 mm h2o.It was reported that suspected valve occlusion.The revision surgery was performed with chpv + sg as a child (at this time only the valve was replaced).After the surgery, the patient¿s condition was not improved.The surgery was ineffective, respiration stops, the symptoms of hydrocephalus deteriorate.It was correspond with outside drainage etc.It was suspected valve occlusion again, and the revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2017.When trying to check whether it was not occluded at the time of removal, and it was found that there was a leak from the point between the variable part and the sg, and was also torn.It was unknown that it had been torn since valve was placed or at the time of removal.The surgeon concerned about the occlusion, and occlusion low-pressure abdominal catheter (not a codman product) and reservoir were placed and a valve was not placed.The surgeon want to the investigate which has there been a valve occlusion.(especially the sg part) and the torn was from the inside or outside.The patient¿s initial was (b)(6) female.She has the original disease.The product will be returned to your site.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned for evaluation.Upon completion of the investigation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Upon completion of the investigation it was noted that the images were taken of the ¿as received¿ valve and are attached.The position of the cam when valve was received was 30 mmh2o.The valve was visually inspected: a tear/cut was noted in the silicone housing on the underside between the valve mechanism and the siphon guard.The valve was hydrated.The valve was tested for programming, with programmer 82-3126 with serial (b)(4), the valve passed the test.The valve was flushed, the valve passed the test no occlusion was noted but leaked from the tear/cut in the silicone housing.The valve was leak tested.Leaked from the tear/cut in the silicone housing.The valve could not be reflux tested, due to the damaged silicone housing.The siphon guard could not be tested, due to the damaged silicone housing.The valve was dried.The siphon guard was removed.The valve was then pressure tested, the valve passed the test.Review of the history device records confirmed the valve product code 82-3162, with lot cvcbmg conformed to the specifications when released to stock in 8th march 2016.The root cause for the tear/cut in the silicone housing is probably due to the user, this however could not be determined.As noted in the ifu silicone has a low tear / cut resistance.Per hhe, it has been concluded that silicone housing tears are not design related, in order for the housing tear to occur the user has to compromise the silicone through a nick or tear in order for the event to occur.Validation testing demonstrates a robust design.Testing has shown that if the silicone housing has been compromised, a housing tear is likely to occur.If the 2nd valve is returned in the future this complaint we be reopened and investigated.Based on the results of this investigation no further action is required.Trends will be monitored for this and similar complaints.At the present time this complaint is closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HAKIM INLINE PROGRAMMABLE VALVE SG
Type of Device
SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A.
rue girardet 29
le locle CH 24 00
SZ  CH 2400
Manufacturer Contact
james kenney
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5088282726
MDR Report Key7164154
MDR Text Key96365090
Report Number1226348-2018-10016
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K992173
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Medical Equipment Company Technician/Representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/04/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2021
Device Catalogue Number82-3162
Device Lot NumberCVCBMG
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/03/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/05/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/08/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age6 YR
-
-