Subsequent, to the initial 30-day medwatch report, it was reported that the steerable guide catheter (sgc) performed as intended.
There was no steering issue or difficulty noted during removal of the sgc.
This event has been reported; therefore, it will remain reportable.
No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).
Subsequent, to the initial 30-day medwatch report, it was reported that the steerable guide catheter (sgc) performed as intended.
There was no steering issue or difficulty noted during removal of the sgc.
This event has been reported; therefore, it will remain reportable.
No further investigation is required.
|
(b)(4).
During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.
The customer reported the clip was discarded.
Investigation is not yet complete.
A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
The clip delivery system referenced in is filed under a separate medwatch report number.
|
This is filed to report the difficult removal.
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2017, the patient, with functional mitral regurgitation (mr), underwent a mitraclip procedure.
Patient anatomy included a large aorta and a small left atrium.
The steerable guide catheter (sgc) was advanced into the patient anatomy without issue.
Due to the patient anatomy, some visualization difficulties were noted.
However, when the clip delivery system (cds) was advanced, a steering issue was noted.
The cds was not properly aligned during insertion and when the m knob was applied, the device did not respond appropriately.
It was decided to remove the cds in order to properly align, but during retraction, one of the clip arms became stuck between the sgc and the grippers.
Troubleshooting maneuvers were performed in order to release the clip arm from the sgc, but troubleshooting was unsuccessful.
The physician made the decision to retract the sgc with the clip remaining stuck on the sgc.
This was performed slowly in order to not injure the patient.
After removal, the decision was made to use a new sgc and a new cds.
A new vessel access site was performed in the right femoral artery.
The clip was implanted in the central portion of the anterior 2/posterior 2 (a2/p2) leaflet segment and the mr was reduced from grade 4+ to grade 1+.
No additional information was provided.
|