• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS SITE-RITE 8 ULTRASOUND; SYSTEM, IMAGING, PULSED ECHO, ULTRASONIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS SITE-RITE 8 ULTRASOUND; SYSTEM, IMAGING, PULSED ECHO, ULTRASONIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 9770500
Device Problem Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574)
Patient Problems Angina (1710); Reaction (2414); Electric Shock (2554)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer, at this time, for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the site rite 8 base system emitted an electrical shock to the user and patient during use.Per the vat coordinator: "the user was performing a routine assessment on a patients right upper arm prior to a picc insertion.When assessing this arm the patient jumped and reported feeling a shock from the probe and the user felt a mild shock in the arm holding the probe that she thought may have been a strong static shock.Staff then moved to inspect the patient¿s left upper arm.Upon placing the probe to the skin on this arm the patient experienced a more intense electric shock that originated from the probe.The patient had an involuntary physical reaction to the shock that was witnessed by staff.Needless to say the patient was extremely unhappy about this happening and the procedure was postponed.The patient stated it felt like ¿electrocution¿ and shortly after reported having angina.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of electrical shock during use of sr8 probe was unconfirmed because the reported issue could not be duplicated at the manufacture site.Visual inspection of the probe handle, nose area, and lens did not reveal any indicates of a high voltage spike from the probe.An electrical safety test was conducted on the device which included a patient leakage test.The results of the test indicated that patient leakage values from the device are within specification.Manufacturing records were reviewed and no potential contributing factors were found during manufacture and quality inspection of the device.The returned system did not display the behavior reported by the complainant and it is likely that the event was caused by another root cause.A history review of serial number (b)(4) showed no other similar complaint(s) from this serial number.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the site rite 8 base system emitted an electrical shock to the user and patient during use.Per the vat coordinator: "the user was performing a routine assessment on a patients right upper arm prior to a picc insertion.When assessing this arm the patient jumped and reported feeling a shock from the probe and the user felt a mild shock in the arm holding the probe that she thought may have been a strong static shock.Staff then moved to inspect the patient¿s left upper arm.Upon placing the probe to the skin on this arm the patient experienced a more intense electric shock that originated from the probe.The patient had an involuntary physical reaction to the shock that was witnessed by staff.Needless to say the patient was extremely unhappy about this happening and the procedure was postponed.The patient stated it felt like ¿electrocution¿ and shortly after reported having angina.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SITE-RITE 8 ULTRASOUND
Type of Device
SYSTEM, IMAGING, PULSED ECHO, ULTRASONIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city UT 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
DYMAX CORP. -2523003
110 marshall drive
warrendale PA 15086
Manufacturer Contact
tesha udy
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city, UT 84116
8015225819
MDR Report Key7191702
MDR Text Key97502412
Report Number3006260740-2017-02431
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IYO
UDI-Device Identifier00801741096891
UDI-Public(01)00801741096891
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K152554
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/29/2017,06/08/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/15/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9770500
Device Catalogue Number9770500
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/03/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date12/14/2017
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer12/29/2017
Date Manufacturer Received05/17/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-