Plant investigation: the device was not returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation and the failure mode cannot be confirmed.However, an investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no deviations or non-conformances during the manufacturing process.All device history records (dhr) are reviewed and released according to the dhr review checklist and release procedure.A device is not released if it does not meet requirements or is nonconforming.In addition, the device record review confirmed the labeling, material, and process controls were within specification.
|
A biomedical engineer (biomed tech) reported during rinse mode of the machine a "low inlet error" alarmed.During troubleshooting the biomed tech reported an exposed wire the size of a pinhole was noted on the wiring harness of valve 39.When the biomed tech was removing the cage when the line from valve 39 the component came into contact with the cage and shorted to the machine and caused a small spark.No patient involvement or injury was reported.Per biomed tech the technician who previously worked on the machine inadvertently pinched the wiring harness on valve 39, when closing the door.Per biomed tech the spark did not affect any other components as no part was reported to be discolored, charred, blackened, melted, or have any heat damage.The exposed wire harness was replaced.The machine was tested, passed all tests and was returned to service.
|