Model Number 97714 |
Device Problems
Charging Problem (2892); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Malaise (2359); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 02/02/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a consumer, via a manufacturer representative (rep), regarding a patient with an implantable neurostim ulator (ins) for non-malignant pain.It was reported that the patient called the rep on the morning of the report with the complaint that the ins was not recharging to 100% over a 3 day period despite having 6-8 out of 8 on connectivity.The patient stated that he only charged up to 75% capacity and it would not charge anymore.The rep said that the patient was currently suffering from a cold so they were not able to meet; the rep noted that the patient would call him back when the patient is able to meet and they can interrogate the ins.No further complications were reported/anticipated.[refer to (b)(4) for information pertaining to sore pocket, reaction to cream].
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from a consumer.It was reported that the patient was having problems with the stimulator.No further complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Due to imdrf harmonization, some previously submitted device, method, result, and conclusion codes related to this event may have been updated.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from the patient.It was reported that the patient was having the device removed because it was not doing what it was to do for him.It just did not work for him.He did not have an appointment for the removal, but he was in contact with his doctor regarding the device.The patient stated he did not know what caused the issue because he also had done lots or programming but was never able to get the right programming for him.No further complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|